收稿日期: 2021-07-17
网络出版日期: 2022-09-20
Translation and psychometric properties evaluation of the Birth Beliefs Scale
目的 汉化分娩信念量表并检验其信效度。 方法 依据翻译和文化适应过程的实践原则对英文版分娩信念量表进行翻译、回译、专家咨询、预调查和文化调适,形成中文版分娩信念量表。邀请7名专家进行3轮内容效度评价。便利选取593名孕晚期女性,采用中文版分娩信念量表进行调查,检验中文版量表的信效度。 结果 中文版分娩信念量表的条目水平的内容效度指数为0.86~1,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.91;总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.76,维度的重测信度为0.83~0.84;验证性因子分析 χ2/df=4.871,RMSEA=0.081,GFI=0.955,AGFI=0.909,IFI=0.914,TLI=0.855,均达到拟合标准。 结论 中文版分娩信念量表具有较好的信效度,可用于评估孕晚期女性的分娩信念。
娄艺 , 郭胜斌 , 顾丽香 , 张钱敏 , 严丽婷 , 邱萍萍 . 分娩信念量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022 , 19(9) : 843 -846 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.09.014
Objective To translate the Birth Beliefs Scale（BBS） into Chinese,and to assess the reliability and validity of Birth Beliefs Scale-Chinese（BBS-C）. Methods The Principle of Good Practice for Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process was followed to translate and back-translate the BBS. The cross-cultural revision of the translated BBS was carried out through expert consulting and pilot survey. An expert panel（n=7） was invited to conduct 3 rounds evaluation of BBS-C. A total of 593 pregnant women in late pregnancy were surveyed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the BBS-C. Results The item-level CVI of BBS-C was 0.86~1 and the scale-level CVI was 0.91. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale was 0.76. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the subscales were 0.83 and 0.84. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=4.871,RMSEA=0.081,GFI=0.955,AGFI =0.909,IFI=0.914,TLI=0.855. Conclusion BBS-C has been proved to be valid and reliable,which can be used to evaluate the birth beliefs of Chinese pregnant women in late pregnancy.
Key words： Parturition beliefs; Scale; Reliability; Validity
| [1] | Preis H, Benyamini Y. The birth beliefs scale - a new measure to assess basic beliefs about birth[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 38(1):73-80. |
| [2] | Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, et al. The influence of women's fear,attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2012, 12:55. |
| [3] | Preis H, Gozlan M, Dan U, et al. A quantitative investigation into women's basic beliefs about birth and planned birth choices[J]. Midwifery, 2018,63:46-51. |
| [4] | Samios C, Townsend M, Newton T. Self-compassion predicts less fear of childbirth in childless women:the mediating role of birth beliefs[J]. Psychol Health, 2021, 36(11):1336-1351. |
| [5] | Durgun Ozan Y, Alp Yilmaz F. Is there a relationship between basic birth beliefs and pregnancy-related anxiety in Turkey[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46(10):2036-2042. |
| [6] | Thompson SM, Low LK, Budé L, et al. Evaluating the effect of an educational intervention on student midwife self-efficacy for their role as physiological childbirth advocates[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 96:104628. |
| [7] | Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes(PRO) measures:report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation[J]. Value Health, 2005, 8(2):94-104. |
| [8] | 方积乾. 医学统计学与电脑实验[M]. 4版. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2012. |
| [8] | Fang JQ. Medical statistics and computer experiments[M]. 4th ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2012. |
| [9] | 刘可. 如何进行内容效度的检验[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2010, 25(1):37-39. |
| [10] | Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling[M]. 2nd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,Publishers, 2004. |
| [11] | 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2004. |
| [11] | Hou JT, Wen ZL, Cheng ZJ. Structural equation model and its applications[M]. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, 2004. |
| [12] | Wilson KL, Sirois FM. Birth attendant choice and satisfaction with antenatal care:the role of birth philosophy,relational style,and health self-efficacy[J]. J Reproductive Infant Psychol, 2010, 28(1):69-83. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |