收稿日期: 2021-08-24
网络出版日期: 2022-07-22
The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nurses’ Health Education Ability Scale
目的 对西班牙语版本的护士健康教育能力量表(Instrumento Competencia de Educación para la Salud del profesional de Enfermería,I-CEpSE)进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法 采用Brislin双人翻译-回译模型对原量表进行翻译、回译,经过跨文化调试及预调查后,形成中文版I-CEpSE,并采用中文版I-CEpSE对青岛市某三级甲等综合性医院546名护士进行问卷调查,以评价量表的信效度。 结果 中文版I-CEpSE保留原量表的58个条目,S-CVI/Ave为0.90;经探索性因子分析后共提取3个特征根≥1的公因子,累积方差贡献率为53.387%;验证性因子分析结果显示, χ2/df=1.283,RMSEA=0.032,SRMR=0.047,IFI=0.952,TLI=0.950,CFI=0.951,量表模型基本适配。中文版I-CEpSE量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.958;重测信度为0.954。结论 中文版I-CEpSE具有良好的信效度,可用于我国文化背景下护士健康教育能力的评估,以便护士明确自身健康教育能力,从而确定其优劣势及学习需求。
王丝瑶 , 魏丽丽 , 单信芝 , 尚全伟 , 朱永洁 , 朱福香 , 刘翠 . 护士健康教育能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022 , 19(7) : 646 -651 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.07.013
Objective To translate the Spanish version of the Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument (I-CEpSE) into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The Brislin two-person translation-back translation model was used to translate the original scale. After cross-cultural adaption and pilot-investigation,the Chinese version of I-CEpSE was finalized. The Chinese version of the I-CEpSE was used to evaluate 546 nurses in a tertiary hospital of Qingdao city. Results The Chinese version of the I-CEpSE kept 58 items of the original scale,and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.90. After exploratory factor analysis,a total of 3 common factors with characteristic roots ≥ 1 were extracted,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 53.387%. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that χ2/df=1.283,RMSEA=0.032,SRMR=0.047,IFI=0.952,TLI=0.950,CFI=0.951,and the scale model was basically adapted. The total Cronbach’s α coefficient of the Chinese version of the I-CEpSE was 0.958. The test-retest reliability was 0.954. Conclusion The Chinese version of I-CEpSE has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate nurses’ health education ability under the cultural background in China. With this scale,nurses’ own health education capabilities and learning needs can be identified.
Key words: Nurses; Health Education; Localization; Reliability; Validity
| [1] | See MTA, Chee SZ, Rajaram R,et al. Missed nursing care in patient education:a qualitative study of different levels of nurses’ perspectives[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2020, 28(8):1960-1967. |
| [2] | Jahromi ZB A study of the barriers and facilitators of patient education from the viewpoint of nursing students at Jahrom College of Nursing [J]. Bangladesh J Med Sci,2016,15(3):471-476. |
| [3] | Pueyo-Garrigues M, Whitehead D, Pardavila-Belio MI,et al. Health education:a Rogerian concept analysis[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 94:131-138. |
| [4] | Pueyo-Garrigues M, Pardavila-Belio MI, Whitehead D,et al. Nurses’ knowledge,skills and personal attributes for competent health education practice:an instrument development and psy-chometric validation study[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(2):715-728. |
| [5] | Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[M]. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,1980:389-444. |
| [6] | 郭金玉, 李峥. 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012, 47(3):283-285. |
| [6] | Guo JY, Li Z. The introduction process of scale and its evaluation standards[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2012, 47(3):283-285. |
| [7] | 赵铁牛, 王泓午, 刘桂芬. 验证性因子分析及应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2010, 27(6):608-609. |
| [7] | Zhao TN, Wang HW, Liu GF. Confirmatory factor analysis and its application[J]. Chin J Heal Stat, 2010, 27(6):608-609. |
| [8] | 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社,2010:158-263. |
| [9] | Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index:are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5):489-497. |
| [10] | 吴明隆. 结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社,2019:212-260. |
| [11] | 孙振球, 徐勇勇, 梁维君,等. 医学统计学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2015:568-576. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |