收稿日期: 2021-08-30
网络出版日期: 2022-07-22
基金资助
国家自然科学基金青年项目(72104244);急救与创伤研究教育部重点实验室开放基金课题(KLET-202005);上海市高水平地方高校创新团队(SHSMU-ZDCX20212801)
The effects of a self-oriented training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation
Received date: 2021-08-30
Online published: 2022-07-22
目的 构建心肺复苏和除颤自助训练模式,并通过随机对照试验检验该模式的应用效果,为创新公众心肺复苏普及形式提供参考。 方法 以美国心脏协会提出的教育策略为理论指导,借鉴自助服务理念,通过搭建自助训练场所、制作教学视频、建立反馈模型、制订管理机制,构建心肺复苏和除颤自助训练模式。通过招募学生志愿者进行随机对照试验,比较该模式与传统集中培训的效果差异,主要结局指标为胸外按压质量,次要结局指标包括其他操作质量、知识水平和训练时长,并调查试验组志愿者对该模式的评价。结果 共119名受试者完成研究,其中试验组53名,对照组66名。两组胸外按压频率正确率、按压足够深度率、按压位置正确率以及胸外按压总分等指标的差异,均无统计学意义(P>0.05);在胸外按压充分回弹率方面,试验组高于对照组(92.09%±18.35%,73.36%±29.20%,t=4.266,P<0.001)。试验组知识水平得分低于对照组(11.92±1.64,13.12±1.22,t=4.420,P<0.001);试验组自助训练时长小于对照组[(37.49±4.61) min,(63.44±2.24) min,t=37.568,P<0.001]。调查结果显示,试验组19名受试者对教学视频内容、场地设施等提出了建议,23名受试者对自助训练模式给予了积极评价。结论 自助训练模式有助于推广和普及单纯胸外按压技术,其效果相当于集中培训模式。应因地制宜配置软硬件以利于自助训练模式充分发挥功效,基于用户需求,加快心肺复苏和除颤自助训练模式的优化与应用研究。
杨宇宸 , 桂莉 , 王毅欣 . 心肺复苏和除颤自助训练模式的构建及初步应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022 , 19(7) : 581 -586 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.07.001
Objective To develop a self-oriented training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation (CPR-D). The effects of the training were examined by a randomized controlled study to provide references to promote the popularization of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in public. Methods Guided by the educational strategy proposed by the American Heart Association and drew by the modern "kiosk" self-service concept,the CPR-D self-oriented training model was constructed,which mainly included setting up self-service training venues,making teaching videos,establishing feedback models,and formulating management mechanisms. The effects of the training model were evaluated by a randomized controlled trial among students. The main outcome was the performance of chest compressions. The secondary outcomes included the performance of the other skills,CPR-D knowledge and the total training time. The evaluation of participants on the self-oriented training was investigated by interviews. Results A total of 119 students were finally included in the study with 53 in the experimental group and 66 in the control group. There were no significant differences in the percentage of the correct rate,adequate depth,correct hand position and the total score of chest compressions between the two groups(P>0.05). As to the percentage of full chest rebound,the experimental group displayed superior to the control group(92.09%±18.35%,73.36%±29.20%,t=4.266,P<0.001). The experimental group scored lower on the knowledge level than the control group(11.92±1.64,13.12±1.22,t=4.420,P<0.001). The duration of training in the experimental group was less than that in the control group[(37.49±4.61) min,(63.44±2.24) min,t=37.568,P<0.001]. The results showed that 19 participants in the experimental group gave some suggestions on the teaching videos and venue facilities,etc. Twenty-three students gave a positive evaluation to the self-oriented training. Conclusion Self-oriented training is helpful to promote and popularize hands-only CPR,and it can get the similar effect with the instructor-oriented training. The configuration of software and hardware according to local conditions is conducive to give full play to the effectiveness of self-help training. It is necessary to optimize the self-oriented training and promote its related researches.
| [1] | Kiguchi T, Okubo M, Nishiyama C,et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the world:first report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation(ILCOR)[J]. Resuscitation, 2020,152:39-49. |
| [2] | 蔡文伟, 李恒杰. 全球复苏联盟提高院外心脏骤停生存率的十项举措[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2021, 30(1):12-14. |
| [3] | 中国红十字基金会. 红十字救在身边,应急救护一体机正式亮相[EB/OL]. [2021-05-06]. https://www.crcf.org.cn/article/21333 |
| [4] | Xu F, Zhang Y, Chen YG. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in China:current situation and future development[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2017, 2(5):469-470. |
| [5] | 马文君. 全国心肺复苏普及进亿家精准健康工程启动[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2017, 42(2):139. |
| [6] | Heard CL, Pearce JM, Rogers MB. Mapping the public first-aid training landscape:a scoping review[J]. Disasters, 2020, 44(1):205-228. |
| [7] | Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR,et al. 2020 Part 1:executive summary:2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation,2020, 142(16_suppl_2):S337-S357. |
| [8] | Greif R, Bhanji F, Bigham BL, et al. Education,implementation,and teams:2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations[J]. Circulation,2020, 142(16_suppl_1):S222-S283. |
| [9] | Womelsdorf T, Thomas C, Neumann A,et al. A Kiosk Station for the assessment of multiple cognitive domains and cognitive enrichment of monkeys[J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2021,15:721069. |
| [10] | Peberdy MA, Silver A, Ornato JP. Effect of caregiver gender,age,and feedback prompts on chest compression rate and depth[J]. Resuscitation, 2009, 80(10):1169-1174. |
| [11] | Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME,et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality:improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital:a consensus statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2013, 128(4):417-435. |
| [12] | 中国红十字会总会, 教育部. 中国红十字会总会教育部关于进一步加强和改进新时代学校红十字工作的通知[J]. 中华人民共和国教育部公报, 2020(S2):13-14. |
| [13] | Chang MP, Gent LM, Sweet M,et al. A novel educational outreach approach to teach Hands-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to the public[J]. Resuscitation, 2017,116:22-26. |
| [14] | Heard DG, Andresen KH, Guthmiller KM,et al. Hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation education:a comparison of on-screen with compression feedback,classroom,and video education[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2019, 73(6):599-609. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |