ISSN 2097-6054（网络） ISSN 1672-9234（印刷） CN 11-5289/R
主管：中国科学技术协会　主办：中华护理学会
出版：中华护理杂志社
收录：中国科学引文数据库（CSCD）来源期刊
　　　中国期刊全文数据库
　　　中国核心期刊（遴选）数据库
　　　Scopus
中华护理教育

中华护理教育 >

2022 , Vol. 19 >Issue 4: 378 - 384

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.04.017

探索与争鸣

基于共识的健康测量工具遴选标准对分娩恐惧量表测量属性的系统评价

  • 赵亚楠 ,
  • 李燕 ,
  • 张静 ,
  • 侯佳文 ,
  • 马喜梅 ,
  • 庄思敏 ,
  • 肖光红 ,
  • 王艳红
展开
  • 730000 兰州市 兰州大学护理学院（赵亚楠,张静,侯佳文,马喜梅,庄思敏,肖光红,王艳红）;香莲乡卫生院（李燕）
赵亚楠：女,本科（硕士在读）,护师,E-mail：1429444211@qq.com;

收稿日期: 2021-05-31

  网络出版日期: 2022-04-20

收起

The instruments of measuring fear of childbirth in pregnancy based on COSMIN：a systematic review of psychometric properties

  • Ya-nan ZHAO ,
  • Yan LI ,
  • Jing ZHANG ,
  • Jia-wen HOU ,
  • Xi-mei MA ,
  • Si-min ZHUANG ,
  • Guang-hong XIAO ,
  • Yan-hong WANG
Expand

Received date: 2021-05-31

  Online published: 2022-04-20

Fold

摘要

目的 采用基于共识的健康测量工具遴选标准（Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments,COSMIN）系统评价分娩恐惧量表的测量属性。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、知网和万方数据库中有关分娩恐惧测量工具的研究,检索时限为建库至2021年3月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献及提取数据,采用COSMIN偏倚风险清单及质量标准对测量工具属性进行系统评价。 结果 共纳入27项研究,包括5种分娩恐惧测量工具。其中,分娩预期/体验问卷（Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire,W-DEQ）内容效度质量为充分,证据质量水平为低级;结构效度质量为充分,证据质量水平为中级;内部一致性质量为充分,证据质量水平为中级;稳定性质量为充分,证据质量水平为高级;假设检验质量为充分,证据质量水平为高级。 结论 推荐应用W-DEQ测量分娩恐惧,其余分娩恐惧量表测量属性质量尚不完善,有待于进一步探究。

关键词： 分娩; 恐惧; 问卷调查; 系统评价; 基于共识的健康测量工具遴选标准

本文引用格式

赵亚楠 , 李燕 , 张静 , 侯佳文 , 马喜梅 , 庄思敏 , 肖光红 , 王艳红 . 基于共识的健康测量工具遴选标准对分娩恐惧量表测量属性的系统评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022 , 19(4) : 378 -384 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.04.017

Abstract

Objectives To identify the most commonly used instruments measuring fear of childbirth （FOC） and assess risk of bias,measurement properties,and level of evidence based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments （COSMIN） guidelines. Methods PubMed,Scopus,CINAHL,Web of Science,SinoMed,Wanfang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect studies on the instruments of measuring FOC from their inception to March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literatures,extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Methodological quality of the studies,quality of measurement properties,and level of evidence were determined using the COSMIN checklist and criteria. Results A total of 27 studies were included,including 5 measurement tools for FDC. The content validity quality of Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire（W-DEQ） was sufficient,and the evidence quality level is low. The structural validity quality was sufficient,and the evidence quality level was intermediate. The internal consistency quality was sufficient,and the evidence quality level was intermediate. The stability quality was sufficient and the evidence quality level was high. The hypothesis testing quality was sufficient and the evidence quality level was high. Conclusion The W-DEQ is recommended to be used in the measurement of childbirth FDC. The quality of the measurement attributes of the other parturition fear scales is still incomplete and needs to be further investigated.

Key words： Parturition; Fear; Questionnaires; Systematic review; Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments

参考文献

[1] Nilsson C, Hessman E, Sj?blom H, et al. Definitions,measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth:a systematic review[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018,18(1):28.
[2] Dencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, et al. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth:a systematic review[J]. Women Birth, 2019,32(2):99-111.
[3] Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M. Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ;a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth[J]. J Psychosom Obset Gynaecol, 1998,19(2):84-97.
[4] 危娟, 刘洁英, 张莉芳, 等. 分娩恐惧量表的汉化及信效度检测[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016,31(2):81-83.
[4] Wei J, Liu JY, Zhang LF, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Childbirth Attitudes Questionnaire[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016,31(2):81-83.
[5] Wijma K, Alehagen S, Wijma B. Development of the delivery fear scale[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2002,23(2):97-107.
[6] Haines H, Pallant JF, Karlstr?m A, et al. Cross-cultural comparison of levels of childbirth-related fear in an Australian and Swedish sample[J]. Midwifery, 2011,27(4):560-567.
[7] Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018,27(5):1147-1157.
[8] Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018,27(5):1171-1179.
[9] Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures:a Delphi study[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018,27(5):1159-1170.
[10] Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007,60(1):34-42.
[11] 赵雨馨. 我国妊娠妇女分娩恐惧发生情况及影响因素研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2019.
[12] 张明. 孕妇产前分娩恐惧及影响因素的研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2016.
[12] Zhang M. The research of antenatal fear of childbirth and its associated factors in pregnant women[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2016.
[13] Gourounti K, Kouklaki E, Lykeridou K. Validation of the Child-birth Attitudes Questionnaire in Greek and psychosocial characteristics of pregnant women with fear of childbirth[J]. Women Birth, 2015,28(3):e44-e51.
[14] Tanglakmankhong K, Perrin NA, Lowe NK. Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory and Childbirth Attitudes Questionnaire:psychometric properties of Thai language versions[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2011,67(1):193-203.
[15] Lowe NK. Self-efficacy for labor and childbirth fears in nulliparous pregnant women[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2000,21(4):219-224.
[16] Shakarami A, Iravani M, Mirghafourvand M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of delivery fear scale (DFS) in Iran[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021,21(1):147.
[17] Ser?ekuş P, İsbir GG, İnci FH. Reliability and validity of the delivery fear scale[J]. Dokuz Eylül üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fa-kültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 2017,10(4):179-185.
[18] Haines HM, Pallant JF, Fenwick J, et al. Identifying women who are afraid of giving birth:a comparison of the fear of birth scale with the WDEQ-A in a large Australian cohort[J]. Sex Reprod Healthc, 2015,6(4):204-210.
[19] Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Karlstr?m A, et al. Exploring the Fear of Birth Scale in a mixed population of women of childbearing age-a Swedish pilot study[J]. Women Birth, 2018,31(5):407-413.
[20] Kuipers J, Henrichs J, Evans K. A comparison of the Fear of Childbirth Scale with the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale to identify childbirth-related fear in a sample of Dutch pregnant women:a diagnostic accuracy comparative cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2020,109:103615.
[21] Wootton BM, Davis E, Moses K, et al. The development and initial validation of the Tokophobia Severity Scale[J]. Clin Psychol, 2020,24(3):267-275.
[22] 刘珊珊, 刘均娥. 北京地区孕妇分娩恐惧现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2015,21(9):997-1000.
[22] Liu SS, Liu JE. Investigation on the status and influencing factors of childbirth fear of pregnant women in Beijing area[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2015,21(9):997-1000.
[23] Korukcu O, Kukulu K, Firat MZ. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) with pregnant women[J]. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 2012,19(3):193-202.
[24] Pitel L, Psenkova P, Jones CCG, et al. Validation of the Slovak version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(W-DEQ),version A[J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2020,121(6):415-421.
[25] Mortazavi F. Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire:an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis[J]. Electron Physician, 2017,9(6):4606-4615.
[26] Ortega-Cejas C, Roldán-Merino J, Lluch-Canut T, et al. Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the “Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire”(W-DEQ-A)[J]. PLoS One, 2021,16(3):e0248595.
[27] Takegata M, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, et al. Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the Wijma Delivery Ex-pectancy/Experience Questionnaire version A[J]. Nurs Health Sci, 2013,15(3):326-332.
[28] Andaroon N, Kordi M, Ghasemi M, et al. The validity and re-liability of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(Version A) in primiparous Women in Mashhad,Iran[J]. Iran J Med Sci, 2020,45(2):110-117.
[29] MoghaddamHosseini V, Makai A, Dweik D, et al. Factor analysis study of the Hungarian translation of Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(version A)[J]. Curr Psy-chol, 2020,39(4):1098-1105.
[30] Garthus-Niegel S, St?rksen HT, Torgersen L, et al. The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire:a factor analy-tic study[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2011,32(3):160-163.
[31] Khwepeya M, Huang HC, Lee GT, et al. Validation of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire for pregnant women in Malawi:a descriptive,cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020,20(1):455.
[32] Pallant JF, Haines HM, Green P, et al. Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2016,16(1):361.
[33] Fenaroli V, Saita E. Fear of childbirth:a contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire(W-DEQ)[J]. TPM Test Psy-chom Methodol Appl Psychol, 2013,20(2):131-154.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉