收稿日期: 2020-12-28
网络出版日期: 2021-09-27
基金资助
河南省科技攻关计划项目(182102310147)
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses
目的 汉化护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感量表（Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses,PUM-SES）,并检测该量表的信效度。 方法 采用Brislin模式对PUM-SES量表进行翻译、回译及跨文化调适,形成中文版PUM-SES量表。请6名专家进行2轮内容效度评价。便利选取河南省4所三级甲等医院1 190名临床护士,采用中文版PUM-SES量表进行调查,评价量表的信度和效度。 结果 中文版PUM-SES量表内容效度指数为0.967,探索性因子分析得到4个公因子,与原量表结构相同,累计方差贡献率为74.93%,验证性因子分析χ2/df=2.87、RMR=0.02、RMSEA=0.06、GFI=0.97、AGFI=0.95、TLI=0.93、IFI=0.91、CFI=0.97、PGFI=0.51,均达到适配（拟合）标准;中文版PUM-SES量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.948,重测信度为0.932。结论 中文版PUM-SES量表信效度较好,可以作为评估护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感的工具。
侯梦晓 , 王飞杰 , 黄丽洁 , 越丽霞 , 赵天云 , 王志霞 . 护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(9) : 840 -843 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.09.015
Objective To translate the Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses （PUM-SES） into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PUM-SES. Methods Brislin’s model was used to translate,back-translate,and culturally adjust the Chinese version of PUM-SES. Six experts were invited to conduct 2 rounds of content validity evaluation. A total of 1190 clinical nurses were recruited by convenient sampling from four tertiary hospitals in Henan province. Results The content validity index（CVI） of the PUM-SES was 0.967. The exploratory factor analysis（EFA） indicated four factors explaining 74.93% of the total variances,the structure is consistent with the original scale. The confirmatory factory analysis（CFA） indicated all measurements fit exceeded the recommended criteria：χ2/df=2.87,RMR=0.02,RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.97,AGFI=0.95,TLI=0.93,IFI=0.91,CFI=0.97,PGFI=0.51. The Cronbach’s α of the PUM-SES was 0.948,and the test-retest reliability was 0.932 in this study. Conclusion The Chinese version of the PUM-SES was proved to be reliable and valid and can effectively assess the self-efficacy of nurses’ management of pressure ulcers in China.
Key words： Nurses; Self Efficacy; Pressure ulcers management; Reliability; Validity; Scale
| [1] | 蒋琪霞. 压疮护理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 6. |
| [1] | Jiang QX. Pressure Ulcer Nursing[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2014: 6. |
| [2] | 蒋琪霞, 管晓萍, 苏纯音, 等. 综合性医院压疮现患率多中心联合调研[J]. 中国护理管理, 2013, 13(1):26-30. |
| [2] | Jiang QX, Guan XP, Su CY, et al. Multicenter investigation on prevalence and incidence rate of pressure ulcers in general hospitals[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2013, 13(1):26-30. |
| [3] | Gaspar S, Peralta M, Marques A, et al. Effectiveness on hospital-acquired pressure ulcers prevention:a systematic review[J]. Int Wound J, 2019, 16(5):1087-1102. |
| [4] | Boyko TV, Longaker MT, Yang GP. Review of the current management of pressure ulcers[J]. Adv Wound Care(New Rochelle), 2018, 7(2):57-67. |
| [5] | White-Chu EF, Flock P, Struck B, et al. Pressure ulcers in long-term care[J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2011, 27(2):241-258. |
| [6] | Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Ghizzardi G, et al. Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2019, 28(17/18):3177-3188. |
| [7] | 郭金玉, 李峥. 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012, 47(3):283-285. |
| [7] | Guo JY, Li Z. The introduction process of scale and its evaluation standards[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2012, 47(3):283-285. |
| [8] | 潘月帅, 魏丽丽, 宋蕾, 等. 医院磁性要素量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(1):145-150. |
| [8] | Pan YS, Wei LL, Song L, et al. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Essentials of Magnetism Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(1):145-150. |
| [9] | 张鼎昆, 方俐洛, 凌文辁. 自我效能感的理论及研究现状[J]. 心理学动态, 1999(1):39-43,11. |
| [9] | Zhang DK, Fang LL, Ling WQ. The theory and research status of self-efficacy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 1999(1):39-43,11. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |