ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
临床实践

肠造口患者自我照护行为执行意向问卷的研制

  • 李雯雯 ,
  • 王淑云 ,
  • 陆连芳 ,
  • 杨富国 ,
  • 张珊珊 ,
  • 刘蕊 ,
  • 韩雪娜
展开
  • 266021 青岛市 青岛大学护理学院(李雯雯,杨富国,张珊珊,刘蕊,韩雪娜);青岛大学附属医院(王淑云,陆连芳)
李雯雯:女,本科,护士,E-mail: 972756941@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-12-29

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-24

Development and validation of a Entorostomy Self-care Implementation Intention Questionnaire

  • Wen-wen LI ,
  • Shu-yun WANG ,
  • Lian-fang LU ,
  • Fu-guo YANG ,
  • Shan-shan ZHANG ,
  • Rui LIU ,
  • Xue-na HAN
Expand

Received date: 2020-12-29

  Online published: 2021-08-24

摘要

目的 编制肠造口患者自我照护行为执行意向问卷并检验其信效度。方法 以执行意向理论及其行动计划和应对计划2种具体形式为结构框架,经文献分析、邀请专家进行2轮专家函询形成问卷初稿。便利选取在青岛市某三级甲等医院门诊复诊的265例肠造口患者进行问卷调查,邀请7名专家进行内容效度测评。采用临界比值法、条目与总分相关系数、同质性检验对问卷进行项目分析;采用探索性因子分析、内容效度、内部一致性信度、重测信度对问卷进行信效度检验。 结果 专家函询过程中,第1轮函询发放问卷27份,回收27份;第2轮函询发放问卷27份,回收25份。2轮专家函询问卷条目的变异系数范围分别为0.066~0.357、0.040~0.199;2轮专家协调程度分别为0.306和0.505,显著性检验P<0.05。形成的肠造口患者自我照护行为执行意向问卷包括2个维度、24个条目,探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为74.309%;问卷总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.961,重测信度为0.877;总问卷的专家内容效度指数为0.976。 结论 肠造口患者自我照护行为执行意向问卷具有良好的信效和效度,具有一定的推广价值,可用于测量肠造口患者自我照护行为执行意向现状。

本文引用格式

李雯雯 , 王淑云 , 陆连芳 , 杨富国 , 张珊珊 , 刘蕊 , 韩雪娜 . 肠造口患者自我照护行为执行意向问卷的研制[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(8) : 742 -748 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.08.015

Abstract

Objective To develop a questionnaire for measuring implementation intention of self-care in patients with enterostomy and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the theory of implementation intention and the two specific forms of action planning and coping planning,the first draft of the questionnaire was formed by inviting 25 experts for two rounds of expert consultation and literature analysis. A total of 265 permanent enterostomy patients from a tertiary hospital in Qingdao were selected by convenience sampling to investigate the draft questionnaire. Seven experts were invited to conduct content validity evaluation. The critical ratio method,the correlation coefficient between items and total scores,and the homogeneity test were used to analyze the questionnaire items. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested by exploratory factor analysis,content validity,Cronbach’s alpha coefficient,and test-retest reliability. Results For the first-round expert consultation,27 e-mails were sent out and 27 responses were received. In the second round,27 emails were sent out and 25 were recovered. The range of coefficient of variation of the 2 rounds was 0.066~0.357 and 0.040~0.199,respectively. The 2 rounds of expert coordination were 0.306 and 0.505 respectively(all P<0.05).The questionnaire consisted of 2 dimensions and 24 items. Four principal factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the contribution rate of the cumulative variance was 74.309%. The total Cronbach’s α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.961,the test-retest reliability was 0.877,and the content index of questionnaire was 0.976. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity. It can be used to measure the situation of self-care behavior implementation intention of enterostomy patients.

参考文献

[1] De Maria M, Matarese M, Strömberg A, et al. Cross-cultural assessment of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory:a psychometric evaluation[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019: 103422.
[2] 张俊娥, 吕琳, 黄漫容, 等. 综合延续护理对出院早期直肠癌结肠造口患者的效果研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2017, 17(4):453-457.
[2] Zhang JE, Lyu L, Huang MR, et al. The effect of comprehensive transitional care among colostomy patients with rectal cancer[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2017, 17(4):453-457.
[3] 周桂兰, 洪菁, 苏梅芳, 等. 造口病人居家自我护理缺陷的现状调查及分析[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(1):157-159.
[3] Zhou GL, Hong J, Su MF, et al. Status quo investigation and analysis of home self-care defects in patients with stoma[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2019, 33(1):157-159.
[4] Giordano V, Nicolotti M, Corvese F, et al. Describing self-care and its associated variables in ostomy patients[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2020, 76(11):2982-2992.
[5] 卢玉仙, 温芬. 基于跨理论模型的社区—家庭协同护理模式对直肠癌造口患者社会适应性的效果研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2019, 34(5):394-397.
[5] Lu YX, Wen F. Effect of community-family cooperative nursing model based on cross-theoretical model on social adaptability of patients with rectal cancer stoma[J]. J Nurses Train, 2019, 34(5):394-397.
[6] Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions:strong effects of simple plans[J]. American Psychologist, 1999, 54(5):493-503.
[7] Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement:a Meta-Analysis of effects and processes[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2006, 38(6):69-119.
[8] 赵伟伟. 从理想到现实:心理对照和执行意向策略对中学生学业成就目标追求的影响研究[D]. 苏州:苏州大学, 2018.
[8] Zhao WW. From fantasy to reality:the influence of mental con-trasting and implementation intention on the academic achie-vement goal pursuit of middle school students[D]. Suzhou:Soochow University, 2018.
[9] 杜娴, 李龙倜, 杨燕, 等. 永久性肠造口患者的精准护理[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(15):22-25.
[9] Du X, Li LT, Yang Y, et al. Precision nursing for patients with permanent erterostomy[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2018, 33(15):22-25.
[10] 胡爱玲, 郑美春, 李伟娟. 现代伤口与肠造口临床护理实践[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2018.
[10] Hu AL, Zheng MC, Li WJ. Modern clinical nursing practice of wound and stoma[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2018.
[11] 王亚菲. 肠造口患儿家庭主要照顾者照护能力测评量表的编制[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2019.
[11] Wang YF. Establishment of the Family Caregivers’ Care Ability Assessment Scale for children with enterostomy[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2019.
[12] 黄小夏, 张丽萍, 陈艳, 等. 新生儿医用粘胶剂相关性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的编制与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(3):380-384.
[12] Huang XX, Zhang LP, Chen Y, et al. Development of Neonate Medical Adhesive Related Skin Injury Risk Assessment Scale and assessment of its validity and reliability[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(3):380-384.
[13] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[13] Wu ML. Questionnaire statistical analysis practice:SPSS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010.
[14] 李磊, 芦桂芝, 李晶, 等. 病区医院感染管理知-信-行问卷编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(9):836-841.
[14] Li L, Lu GZ, Li J, et al. Psychometric properties of the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice of Healthcare Associated Infection Control in Ward in Healthcare Setting[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(9):836-841.
[15] 刘红云. 高级心理统计[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019.
[15] Liu HY. Advanced psychological statistics[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2019.
[16] 林妙然, 姜小鹰, 胡荣. 急性白血病患者报告临床结局量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(3):350-355.
[16] Lin MR, Jiang XY, Hu R. Development and validation of the Patient-reported Outcomes Instrument for Acute Leukemia[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(3):350-355.
[17] 胡雁, 王志稳. 护理研究[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
[17] Hu Y, Wang ZW. Nursing research[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2017.
[18] 李莹, 刘婷, 苗秀欣, 等. 痛风影响量表的汉化与信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(10):1472-1477.
[18] Li Y, Liu T, Miao XX, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Gout Impact Scale[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2019, 19(10):1472-1477.
[19] 宗倩, 刘志梅, 张洁, 等. 围手术期护士预防患者深静脉血栓形成知信行调查问卷的编制与评价[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2020, 36(5):366-372.
[19] Zong Q, Liu ZM, Zhang J, et al. Development and evaluation of questionnaire on knowledge,belief and practice of periope-rative nurses in prevention of deep venous thrombosis[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2020, 36(5):366-372.
[20] 刘梦珠, 王晓旭, 于爽. 肢端肥大症患者生活质量问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(12):933-936.
[20] Liu MZ, Wang XX, Yu S. Testing the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2019, 16(12):933-936.
[21] 皋文君, 于龙娟, 袁长蓉. 结肠癌造口患者心理健康水平的现状及其影响因素[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2017, 34(15):1-5.
[21] Gao WJ, Yu LJ, Yuan CR. Psychological well-being of patients with colostomy and its influencing factors[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2017, 34(15):1-5.
[22] 王林, 时勘, 赵杨. 行为执行意向的理论观点及其相关研究[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(4):875-879.
[22] Wang L, Shi K, Zhao Y. The implementation intention of behavior:a brief introduction[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2014, 37(4):875-879.
文章导航

/