ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
教育信息化专题

虚拟现实技术在护理教学中应用效果的Meta分析

  • 豆欣蔓 ,
  • 裴菊红 ,
  • 张玉芳 ,
  • 高祝英 ,
  • 王兴蕾
展开
  • 730000 兰州市 兰州大学护理学院
豆欣蔓:女,博士,副教授,主任护师,E-mail: douxm@lzu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2020-12-06

  网络出版日期: 2021-07-25

Virtual reality in nursing education:a meta-analysis

  • Xin-man DOU ,
  • Ju-hong PEI ,
  • Yu-fang ZHANG ,
  • Zhu-ying GAO ,
  • Xing-lei WANG
Expand

Received date: 2020-12-06

  Online published: 2021-07-25

摘要

目的 系统评价虚拟现实技术在护理专业学生教学中的应用效果。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、知网数据库、万方数据库和维普数据库,收集建库至2020 年11月的虚拟现实技术用于护理专业学生教学的随机对照试验研究,采用Cochrane评价手册中提供的随机对照试验研究质量评价标准对纳入文献质量进行评价。采用Stata 13.0软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入9项随机对照试验,包括638名学生。Meta分析结果显示,与其他或传统护理教学方法相比,虚拟现实技术可更好提高护理专业学生的理论知识水平[SMD=0.51,95%CI(0.31,0.70),P<0.05],但在改善护理教学实践技能水平[SMD=0.15,95%CI(-0.21,0.51),P=0.42]和满意度[SMD=0.01,95%CI(-0.81, 0.82),P=0.99]方面无明显效果。结论 与其他或传统护理教学方法相比,虚拟现实技术可更好提高护理专业学生理论知识水平,但虚拟现实技术在提高护理教学实践技能水平和满意度方面无明显优势。

本文引用格式

豆欣蔓 , 裴菊红 , 张玉芳 , 高祝英 , 王兴蕾 . 虚拟现实技术在护理教学中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(7) : 618 -622 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.07.008

Abstract

Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality on nursing education. Methods We performed a systematic search in PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wanfang,and VIP to collect RCT studies about effects of virtual reality on nursing education published from inception to Nov. 2020. The quality of the included studies were evaluated using the RCT quality assessment criteria provided in the Cochrane evaluation manual. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 13.0. Results Nine studies were recruited with 638 participants. Meta-analysis showed that virtual reality could effectively improve the level of knowledge[SMD=0.51,95%CI(0.31,0.70),P<0.05],compared with other or traditional nursing teaching modes. However,there was no statistically significant difference between virtual reality and non-virtual reality group about practical skills [SMD=0.15,95%CI(-0.21,0.51),P=0.42] and satisfaction[SMD=0.01,95%CI(-0.81,0.82),P=0.99].Conclusion Compared with other or traditional teaching method,virtual reality can improve the knowledge of nursing students better. However,virtual reality has no obvious advantage in improving students practical skills and satisfaction level.

参考文献

[1] 何丽亚, 董彩梅, 肖霞. 湖南省护理专业学生职业认同现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2017, 14(4):314-318.
[1] He LY, Dong CM, Xiao X. Professional identity of nursing students in Hunan Province and its influencing factors[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2017, 14(4):314-318.
[2] Jarvelainen M, Cooper S, Jones J. Nursing students’ educational experience in regional Australia:reflections on acute events. A qualitative review of clinical incidents[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2018, 31:188-193.
[3] Khammarnia M, Ravangard R, Barfar E, et al. Medical errors and barriers to reporting in ten hospitals in Southern Iran[J]. Malays J Med Sci, 2015, 22(4):57-63.
[4] 郝粉娟, 杨惠云, 周西, 等. 虚拟现实技术在我国护理领域中的应用现状[J]. 护理学杂志(综合版), 2015, 30(7):111-113.
[4] Hao FJ, Yang HY, Zhou X, et al. Research status on applica-tion of virtual reality technique in the field of Chinese nurs-ing[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2015, 30(7):111-113.
[5] 余美华, 杨文娅. 虚拟现实技术在康复科护生教学中的应用效果[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2020(9):103-104.
[5] Yu MH, Yang WY. The application effect of virtual reality technology in the teaching of nursing students in rehabilitation department[J]. China High Med Educ, 2020(9):103-104.
[6] Bryant R, Miller CL, Henderson D. Virtual clinical simulations in an online advanced health appraisal course[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2015, 11(10):437-444.
[7] Haerling KA. Cost-utility analysis of virtual and mannequin-based simulation[J]. Simul Healthc, 2018, 13(1):33-40.
[8] İsmailoǧlu EG, Zaybak A. Comparison of the effectiveness of a virtual simulator with a plastic arm model in teaching intravenous catheter insertion skills[J]. Comput Inform Nurs, 2018, 36(2):98-105.
[9] Jung EY, Park DK, Lee YH, et al. Evaluation of practical exer-cises using an intravenous simulator incorporating virtual reality and haptics device technologies[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2012, 32(4):458-463.
[10] LeFlore JL, Anderson M, Zielke MA, et al. Can a virtual patient trainer teach student nurses how to save lives:teaching nursing students about pediatric respiratory diseases[J]. Simul Healthc, 2012, 7(1):10-17.
[11] Liaw SY, Chan SW, Chen FG, et al. Comparison of virtual patient simulation with mannequin-based simulation for improving clinical performances in assessing and managing clinical deterioration:randomized controlled trial[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2014, 16(9):e214.
[12] Padilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, et al. Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education:randomized controlled trial[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2019, 21(3):e11529.
[13] Smith SJ, Farra SL, Ulrich DL, et al. Effectiveness of two varying levels of virtual reality simulation[J]. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2018, 39(6):E10-E15.
[14] Sherman WR, Craig AB. Understanding virtual reality:interface,application,and design[M]. San Mateo,CA: Morgan Kauf-mann Publishers Inc, 2002.
[15] Chavez B, Bayona S. Virtual reality in the learning process[C]//Rocha A,Adeli H,Reis L,et al. Trends and advances in information systemsand technologies. Switzerland:Springer,Cham, 2018:1345-1356.
[16] Forsberg E, Ziegert K, Hult H, et al. Assessing progression of clinical reasoning through virtual patients:an exploratory study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2016, 16(1):97-103.
[17] Chan CKY. Exploring an experiential learning project through Kolb’s Learning Theory using a qualitative research method[J]. Eur J Eng Educ, 2012, 37(4):405-415.
[18] Gu Y, Zou Z, Chen X. The effects of vSIM for nursing? As a teaching strategy on fundamentals of nursing education in undergraduates[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2017, 13(4):194-197.
文章导航

/