收稿日期: 2020-05-23
网络出版日期: 2021-05-24
基金资助
新疆医科大学护理学自治区重点专业创新创业示范专业建设经费资助;新疆医科大学护理学院2018年度教育教学改革与建设研究课题资助(HLYG-2018-13)
The development and psychometric properties testing of the Undergraduate Nursing Classroom Teaching Quality Scale
目的 编制本科护理专业课堂教学质量评价工具,并评价其信效度。 方法 以Kano模型为理论框架,通过文献回顾确定条目池,经专家函询和预调查对量表条目进行修订和筛选,形成正式量表。采用方便抽样的方法,于2019年12月选取某高校护理专业一、二年级238名学生作为研究对象进行问卷调查,评价本科护理专业课堂教学质量评价量表的结构效度和内部一致性。选择参与第2轮函询的11名专家进行内容效度评价。 结果 本科护理专业课堂教学质量评价量表共16对条目,包括教师素养、课前设计、课堂活力、课后反思4个维度。总量表内容效度指数（S-CVI）为0.954,各条目内容效度指数（I-CVI）为0.818~1。探索性因子分析共提取出4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为65.487%;经验证性因子分析, χ 2/df=2.536,RMSEA=0.080,CFI=0.974,NFI=0.959,RFI=0.943,IFI=0.974,TLI=0.965,具有较好的拟合优度。量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.892,各维度Cronbach’s α系数为0.886~0.974。结论 本科护理专业课堂教学质量评价量表信度和效度良好,可作为评价本科护理专业课堂教学质量的工具。
赵越 , 刘鑫鑫 , 徐月贞 , 由淑萍 . 本科护理专业课堂教学质量评价量表的编制及信效度评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(5) : 428 -432 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.05.010
Objective To develop and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Undergraduate Nursing Classroom Teaching Quality Scale. Methods Based on Kano model,the initial scale was designed through literature review. The items of the scale were revised and finalized through experts consultation and pilot investigation. By using convenient sampling,238 freshmen and sophomores in a university were selected in December 2019 to evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the Undergraduate Nursing Classroom Teaching Quality Scale.An expert panel（n=11） was used to evaluate the content validity of the scale. Results The Undergraduate Nursing Classroom Teaching Quality Scale had 16 items including 4 dimensions of teacher quality,pre-class design,classroom vitality,and after-class reflection. The S-CVI of the total scale was 0.954,and I-CVI of each item was from 0.818 to 1.The exploratory factor score extracted 4 common factors and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 65.487%. By confirmatory factor analysis,the scale had good fitness with χ 2/df=2.536,RMSEA（0.080）,CFI（0.974）,NFI（0.959）,RFI（0.943）,IFI（0.974）,TLI（0.965）. The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.892,and Cronbach’s α coefficient of each dimension was 0.886~0.974. Conclusion The Undergraduate Nursing Classroom Teaching Quality Scale has a good reliability and validity,and it can be used as a tool to evaluate the undergraduate nursing classroom teaching quality.
Key words： Education; Nursing; Classroom Teaching; Quality evaluation; Scale; Reliability; Validity
| [1] | 郭婕. 全日制专业学位硕士教育满意度调查研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2015. |
| [1] | Guo J. Empirical study on satisfaction of the full-time professional degree education of master degree[D]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University, 2015. |
| [2] | Xu JB, Lo A, Wu J. Are students customers? Tourism and hos-pitality students’ evaluation of their higher education expe-rience[J]. J Teach Travel Tour, 2018,18(3):236-258. |
| [3] | Guilbault M. Students as customers in higher education:the(controversial) debate needs to end[J]. J Retail Consumer Serv, 2018,40:295-298. |
| [4] | Guilbault M. Students as customers in higher education:reframing the debate[J]. J Mark High Educ, 2016,26(2):132-142. |
| [5] | Research UH. Trends in higher education marketing,recruitment,and technology[J/OL]. Hanover Res,2014：1-25. [2020-05-30]. https://www.hanoverresearch.com/media/Trends-in-Higher-Education-Marketing-Recruitment-and-Technology-2.pdf. |
| [6] | Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F, et al. Attractive quality and must-be quality[J]. Hintshitsu, 1984,14(2):56-147. |
| [7] | 刘文超, 张旺喜, 文昌俊. 基于Kano模型的专业实习教学质量满意度测评[J]. 湖北工业大学学报, 2009,24(1):35-37. |
| [7] | Liu WC, Zhang WX, Wen CJ. Satisfaction evaluation of the quality of professional practice teaching based on Kano model[J]. J Hubei Univ Technol, 2009,24(1):35-37. |
| [8] | 任丽平, 张晓敏, 管兰芳, 等. 基于KANO模型的高校教师课堂教学质量影响因素分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2018(6):49-50,102. |
| [8] | Ren LP, Zhang XM, Guan LF, et al. An analysis on influencing factors of college teachers’ classroom teaching quality based on KANO model[J]. China High Med Educ, 2018(6):49-50,102. |
| [9] | 郭婕, 朱宏斌. 基于Kano模型的全日制专业硕士教育满意度研究:以L大学为例[J]. 长春大学学报, 2015,25(8):88-93. |
| [9] | Guo J, Zhu HB. Research on educational satisfaction of full-time professional master based on Kano model—taking L university for an example[J]. J Changchun Univ, 2015,25(8):88-93. |
| [10] | 王海宇. 高校教学质量属性分类及应用研究:基于Kano模型[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2014,26(19):137-139. |
| [10] | Wang HY. Research on classification and application of university teaching quality attributes:based on Kano model[J]. Mod Bus Trade Ind, 2014,26(19):137-139. |
| [11] | 胡雁. 护理研究[M]. 4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012. |
| [11] | Hu Y. Nursing research[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2012. |
| [12] | 张文彤, 董伟. SPSS统计分析高级教程[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013. |
| [12] | Zhang WT, Dong W. SPSS statistical analysis advanced program[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013. |
| [13] | 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009. |
| [13] | Wu ML. Structural equation modeling:operation and application of AMOS[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009. |
| [14] | 陈佳欣, 李丽波, 郑晓宇, 等. 高校课堂教学质量评价指标的结构方程建构[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2020,12(8):58-61. |
| [14] | Chen JX, Li LB, Zheng XY, et al. The construction of structural equations for evaluation indexes of classroom teaching quality in college and university[J]. China Continuing Med Educ, 2020,12(8):58-61. |
| [15] | 任丽平, 侯建成, 郑中华, 等. 卡诺模型在高校课堂教学质量评价中的应用研究[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2018,36(16):68-70. |
| [15] | Ren LP, Hou JC, Zheng ZH, et al. Research on the application of Kano model in the evaluation college classroom teaching quality[J]. Heal Vocat Educ, 2018,36(16):68-70. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |