收稿日期: 2020-07-14
网络出版日期: 2021-05-07
基金资助
2015年安徽省省级大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)示范项目;安徽省教育厅2019年度高校科学研究项目(SK2019A0196);安徽省2020年度高等学校省级质量工程项目(2020xskt310)
Design and implementation of online teaching of Surgical Nursing based on deep learning theory
目的 探讨面向深度学习的外科护理学线上教学效果。方法 采用行动研究法,以深度学习理论为基础,从知识掌握、能力培养以及情感体验3个层面构建课前、课中及课后3个阶段的外科护理学在线学习模式,开展了2轮行动研究,评价课后学生的成绩、深度学习结果及教学满意度。结果 第一轮行动反映课前学生自主学习重难点知识掌握差异大、师生互动不足,课中小组合作式学习的参与度与学习深度不够,课后作业不能反映学生人文关怀及创新能力。第二轮针对第一轮的问题改进后,结果显示学生对重难点知识掌握有所提高,深度学习得分得到提高(P<0.05),学生对教学的参与认可度、学习资源认可度、能力培养认可度均较高。结论 面向深度学习的外科护理学线上教学方案有利于促进学生更好地掌握知识,提升学生的深层学习动机和学习投入,提升其整合性学习、反思巩固学习、高阶学习能力。
周雪妃 , 朱宁宁 , 薛芳 , 孙婷 . 面向深度学习的外科护理学线上教学设计与实施[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(4) : 329 -334 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.04.008
Objective To explore the effects of online teaching of Surgical Nursing based on deep learning theory. Methods The online teaching was developed by addressing three aspects including knowledge acquisition,ability training,and emotional experience before,during,and after class. The teaching development was based on deep learning theory and use two-round action research method. Students’ performance,deep learning results and teaching satisfaction were evaluated. Results When the first-round action research was completed,some problems emerged:large differences in difficult points understanding before class,few interactions between instructors and students,insufficient participation and learning depth in group cooperative learning,and little reflection of humanistic care and innovative ability in homework. When these problems were addressed in second-round action research,students’ knowledge acquisition and deep learning performance were improved(P<0.05). Besides,students’ recognition of teaching participation,learning resources,and ability cultivation were all improved. Conclusion The online teaching program of Surgical Nursing based on deep learning theory is helpful for students with their knowledge improvement,and deep learning motivation and involvement. The teaching can improve the integrated learning,the reflecting learning,and high-level learning.
Key words: Nursing Care; Curriculum; Education; Distance; Specialties; Surgical; Deep learning; Action research
| [1] | 徐振国, 张冠文, 孟祥增, 等. 基于深度学习的学习者情感识别与应用[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019,40(2):87-94. |
| [1] | Xu ZG, Zhang GW, Meng XZ, et al. Learners’ emotion recog-nition and its application based on deep learning[J]. E-Educ Res, 2019,40(2):87-94. |
| [2] | 教育部. 教育部应对新型冠状病毒感染肺炎疫情工作领导小组办公室关于在疫情防控期间做好普通高等学校在线教学组织与管理工作的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2020-02-05). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202002/t20200205_418138.html. |
| [3] | Marton F, Saljo R. On qualitative difference in learning. Ⅰ. Outcome and process[J]. Br J Educ Psychol, 1976,46(1):4-11. |
| [4] | 黄志芳, 周瑞婕, 赵呈领, 等. 面向深度学习的混合式学习模式设计及实证研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2019(11):120-128. |
| [4] | Huang ZF, Zhou RJ, Zhao CL, et al. Empirical research on blended learning mode design for deep learning[J]. China Educ Technol, 2019(11):120-128. |
| [5] | 冷静, 吴小芳, 顾小清. 面向深度学习的在线课程活动设计研究:基于英国开放大学的案例剖析[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2017,35(2):56-65. |
| [5] | Leng J, Wu XF, Gu XQ. Research on the deep learning online course activity design:based on case analysis to the open university of UK[J]. J Distance Educ, 2017,35(2):56-65. |
| [6] | 李玉斌, 苏丹蕊, 李秋雨, 等. 面向混合学习环境的大学生深度学习量表编制[J]. 电化教育研究, 2018,39(12):94-101. |
| [6] | Li YB, Su DR, Li QY, et al. Developing college students’ deep learning scale for blended learning environment[J]. E-Educ Res, 2018,39(12):94-101. |
| [7] | 宋琳琳. 大学生利用网络学习空间开展深度学习现状调查研究[D]. 大连:辽宁师范大学, 2018. |
| [7] | Song LL. A survey of college students’ deep learning using network learning space[D]. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University, 2018. |
| [8] | 龙成志, 刘志梅, 吴喜雁. 大学生自主学习策略对学习绩效的影响:学习动机的调节作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2017,5(2):89-98. |
| [8] | Long CZ, Liu ZM, Wu XY. The influence of college students’ autonomy strategies on learning performance with moderating effect of learning motivation[J]. Psychol:Tech Appl, 2017,5(2):89-98. |
| [9] | 黄卓芬. 网络学习者学习风格特征及其个性化网络课程设计[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2011. |
| [9] | Huang ZF. E-learning learners’ learning style and the design of individualized network curriculum[D]. Wuhan:Central China Normal University, 2011. |
| [10] | Steen-Utheim A, Wittek AL. Dialogic feedback and potentia-lities for student learning[J]. Learn Cult Soc Interact, 2017,15:18-30. |
| [11] | Davies M. Concept mapping,mind mapping and argument map-ping:what are the differences and do they matter?[J]. High Educ, 2011,62(3):279-301. |
| [12] | Oldland E, Currey J, Considine J, et al. Nurses’ perceptions of the impact of Team-Based Learning participation on learning style,team behaviours and clinical performance:an exploration of written reflections[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2017,24:62-69. |
| [13] | Filius RM, de Kleijn RAM, Uijl SG, et al. Strengthening dialo-gic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs[J]. Comput Educ, 2018,125:86-100. |
| [14] | Dowden T, Pittaway S, Yost H, et al. Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education:ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress[J]. Assess Eval High Educ, 2013,38(3):349-362. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |