ISSN 2097-6054(网络) ISSN 1672-9234(印刷) CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   Scopus
论著

创客教育在本科外科护理学辅助教学实践项目中的应用研究

  • 卫美蓉 ,
  • 闻丽芬 ,
  • 姚坤 ,
  • 陶丹 ,
  • 施喜侠
展开
  • 710123 西安市 西京学院医学院(卫美蓉,闻丽芬,姚坤);空军军医大学唐都医院(陶丹);西安高新医院(施喜侠)
卫美蓉:女,硕士,讲师,E-mail: weimeirong163@163.com

收稿日期: 2020-04-04

  网络出版日期: 2021-02-07

基金资助

校级科研基金(JGYB1938)

The effects of maker education applied in assisted teaching practice of Surgical Nursing in undergraduates

  • Mei-rong WEI ,
  • Li-fen WEN ,
  • Kun YAO ,
  • Dan TAO ,
  • Xi-xia SHI
Expand
  • Medical College,Xijing University,Xi’an,710123,China

Received date: 2020-04-04

  Online published: 2021-02-07

摘要

目的 探讨在外科护理学辅助教学实践项目中开展创客教育的应用效果。 方法 在我校2017级护理专业学生中随机抽取2个班,分别作为试验组和对照组。在32学时的外科护理学辅助教学实践项目中,试验组的54名学生开展创客教育,主要包括情怀故事引入、简单任务模仿、知识要点讲解、扩展任务模仿、创新激发引导、协同任务完成、成功作品分享7个环节,让学生围绕临床护理问题开展护理用物或方法的革新;对照组的52名学生在教师指导下在实验室进行操作练习,主要包括示教、分组练习、巡回示教、考核与总结几个环节。项目结束时,对两组学生进行实践技能操作考核,采用创造性思维测验对两组学生进行调查,同时采用自设问卷调查试验组学生对教学效果的评价。 结果 辅助教学实践项目实施后,两组学生的实践操作成绩差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组创造性思维测验得分高于对照组(P<0.05),试验组学生对教学评价均分为(4.18±0.13)分。 结论 在外科护理学辅助教学实践项目开展创客教育,可以提高护理本科生的创造性思维,教学效果也得到大部分学生的认可。

本文引用格式

卫美蓉 , 闻丽芬 , 姚坤 , 陶丹 , 施喜侠 . 创客教育在本科外科护理学辅助教学实践项目中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021 , 18(2) : 125 -129 . DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.02.006

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of the maker education in assisted teaching practice of Surgical Nursing in undergraduates. Methods Students in two classes were randomly selected and assigned to the experimental group or the control group. Maker education was carried out in 54 students of the experimental group. Contents of the maker education were consisted of 7 aspects including story introduction,simple task simulation,key points explanation,comprehensive task simulation,innovation guidance,task completion,and works demonstration. The 52 students in the control group were guided to practice the skills in the lab room. Contents included teaching,group practice,tour teaching,assessment,and summary. At the end of the course,two groups of students were assessed for their practical skills. Besides,the Test of Creative Imagination and the evaluation form were used to evaluate the effects of the maker education. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the skill performance of students in two groups(P>0.05). The creative thinking score of students in the experimental group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). Students in the experimental group gave an average score of(4.18±0.13) for their teaching evaluation. Conclusion Maker education can improve the creative thinking of nursing undergraduates,and the method is also recognized by most students.

参考文献

[1] 张璐, 杨庆爱, 王若维. 护理专业本科生创新能力内涵及构成要素的探讨[J]. 护理研究, 2016,30(10):1251-1253.
[1] Zhang L, Yang QA, Wang RW. Probe into of connotation and constituent elements of innovation ability of nursing undergraduates[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2016,30(10):1251-1253.
[2] 王志强, 李菲, 卓泽林. 美国高校创客教育与STEM教育的融合:理念、路径、启示[J]. 复旦教育论坛, 2016,14(4):101-107.
[2] Wang ZQ, Li F, Zhuo ZL. The integration between maker education and STEM education in the United States:concepts,implementation and implications[J]. Fudan Educ Forum, 2016,14(4):101-107.
[3] Joo YJ, Lim KY, Lim E. Investigating the structural relationship among perceived innovation attributes,intention to use and actual use of mobile learning in an online university in South Korea[J]. Aust J Educ Technol, 2014,30(4):427-439.
[4] Sheridan KM, Halversons ER, Litts B, et al. Learning in the making:a comparative case study of three maker space[J]. Harv Educ Rev, 2014,84(4):505-531.
[5] 段霞, 陈翠萍, 施雁. 优质护理服务创新方案的实施及效果分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2013,28(3):58-60.
[5] Duan X, Chen CP, Shi Y. Application and effectiveness of high quality nursing reform scheme[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2013,28(3):58-60.
[6] 康晓凤, 陈京立, 绳宇, 等. 以临床能力为基础构建护理专业本科实践教学体系[J]. 中华护理教育, 2015,12(1):63-65.
[6] Kang XF, Chen JL, Sheng Y, et al. The construction of competency-based practice teaching system in baccalaureate nursing education[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2015,12(1):63-65.
[7] 曾永强. 为创作而学—4C教学法在小学Scratch教学中的应用[J]. 中国信息技术教育, 2013(4):48-49.
[7] Zeng YQ. Learning for creation-application of 4C teaching method in Scratch teaching in primary school[J]. China Inf Technol Educ, 2013(4):48-49.
[8] 傅骞. 基于“中国创造”的创客教育支持生态研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2015(11):6-12.
[8] Fu Q. A preliminary study of supporting ecosystem for maker education based on Chinese innovation[J]. China Educ Technol, 2015(11):6-12.
[9] Ronald A. Beghetto, James C. Kaufman. 培养学生的创造力[M]. 陈菲,周晔晗,李娴,译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2013:86-89.
[9] Beghetto RA, Kaufman JC. Nurturing creativity in the classroom[M]. Chen F,Zhou YH,Li X,trans. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2013:86-89.
[10] 栗玉波. 创造性思维测验(TCI)中文版修订[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2012.
[10] Su YB. The Chinese revision of the Test of Creative Imagination[D]. Zhengzhou:Zhengzhou University, 2012.
[11] 李庆丰, 胡万山. 大学生创造力倾向发展研究:基于对北京工科院校J大学的调查分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016,16(2):71-80.
[11] Li QF, Hu WS. Study on the development of college Students’ Creativity tendency[J]. J Beijing Univ Technol Soc Sci Ed, 2016,16(2):71-80.
[12] 黄道主, 岳伟. 创新教育实践的人学追问[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2011(12):21-23,30.
[12] Huang DZ, Yue W. Humanistic Questioning of Innovative Education Practice[J]. J Chin Soc Educ, 2011(12):21-23,30.
[13] 邓纯雅. 克里斯·安德森中国制造将属于“中国创客”[J]. 中外管理, 2015(1):34-36.
[13] Deng CY. Chris Anderson Made in China will belong to "China Maker"[J]. Sino Foreign Management, 2015(1):34-36.
[14] 史淑杰, 沈跃兰, 郭续彩, 等. 护理本科生临床应变能力影响因素的调查分析[J]. 护理研究, 2009,23(18):1617-1618.
[14] Shi SJ, Shen YL, Guo XC, et al. A survey and analysis of influencing factors on clinical ability to adapt oneself to changes of nursing students[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2009,23(18):1617-1618.
文章导航

/