目的 引入马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷（the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire,MCTQ）,并进行跨文化调适,形成中文版MCTQ,并进行信、效度检验。方法 对英文版MCTQ进行翻译、回译及文化调适,形成中文版MCTQ。选取426名护理实习生作为研究对象采用中文版MCTQ问卷进行调查,其中30名学生在2周后进行重测,邀请 8名专家对中文版MCTQ进行内容效度评价,以评价该问卷的信度及效度。结果 中文版MCTQ探索性因子分子提取4个公因子,包括建模、辅导、表达探索、学习环境。量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.912,重测信度为0.862,内容效度为0.960。结论 中文版MCTQ问卷有严谨的理论基础,在中国文化背景下具有较高的信度和效度,可作为护理实习生反馈评价临床教学质量的有效工具。

Objective This study was to translate the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire（MCTQ） into Chinese and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MCTQ. Methods After the translation,re-translation and cultural adjustment of the MCTQ,the Chinese version of MCTQ was obtained. A total of 426 nursing interns were surveyed by the Chinese version of the MCTQ questionnaire. Among them,30 students were retested after 2 weeks. Eight experts were invited to evaluate the content validity of the Chinese version of MCTQ. Results Exploratory factor analysis showed that there were 4 factors of the Chinese version of MCTQ, including modeling, coaching, expression exploration, and learning environment. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the overall scale was 0.912. The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.862. Its content validity was 0.960. Conclusion The Chinese version of MCTQ has a rigorous theoretical basis and high reliability and validity in the context of Chinese culture. It can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the clinical teaching quality for nursing students.