临床模拟学习沉浸量表的汉化及其在护理专业学生中的信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2023.08.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化临床模拟学习沉浸量表（Learning Immersion Scale in clinical Simulation，LISS），并检验其信效度。方法通过Brislin翻译模型对量表进行翻译、回译、文化调试、预调查，形成中文版临床模拟学习沉浸量表。于2022年7月—9月，采用便利抽样法对250名护理专业学生进行问卷调查，由6名专家进行内容效度评价，采用探索性因子分析评价中文版LISS量表的结构效度，并评价其内部一致性、折半信度和重测信度。结果中文版LISS共4个维度（认知同化、情感认同、注意力集中和学习体验），16个条目。量表的内容效度（S-CVI）为0.983，各条目的内容效度（I-CVI）为0.890~1.000。探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子，累计方差贡献率为88.266%；量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.980，各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.904~0.964；量表的重测信度为0.913。结论中文版LISS具有较好的信效度，可用于评估护理专业学生在临床模拟学习中的沉浸感。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 模拟, 沉浸, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Learning Immersion Scale in clinical Simulation（LISS） and test its reliability and validity among nursing students. Methods According to the Brislin’s translation model，the Chinese version of the LISS was culturally revised by the forward-back translation，cultural adjustment and pilot survey from July to September 2022. A total of 250 nursing students were investigated by the convenience sampling method. The content validity was tested by six experts. The exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate the structural validity. In addition，the internal consistency，and re-test reliability of the scale were evaluated. Results The Chinese version of LISS included four dimensions（cognitive assimilation，emotional buy-in，focused attention and learning experience） and 16 items. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors，and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 88.266%. The content validity of the total scale and each item was 0.983，and 0.890~1.000 respectively. Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale and each dimension was 0.980，and 0.904~0.964 respectively. The re-test reliability was 0.913. Conclusion The Chinese version of the LISS has good reliability and validity，which can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the nursing students’ immersion in clinical simulation learning.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Simulation, Immersion, Reliability, Validity

戴美玲, 冯瑶, 张帆, 陈莹. 临床模拟学习沉浸量表的汉化及其在护理专业学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 946-950.

DAI Meiling, FENG Yao, ZHANG Fan, CHEN Ying. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Learning Immersion Scale in Clinical Simulation among nursing students[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(8): 946-950.

图/表 1

参考文献 16

[1]	吴丽萍, 郭爱敏, 杨慧, 等. 多学科合作情境模拟教学在护理硕士专业学位研究生临床思维训练课程中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(7):927-930.
	Wu LP, Guo AM, Yang H, et al. Application of simulation teaching based on multi-disciplinary cooperation in clinical thinking training course for master of nursing specialist[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2018, 18(7):927-930.
[2]	Tagwa O. Nursing students’ perceptions of satisfaction and self-confidence with clinical simulation experience[J]. J Educ Prac, 2016, 7(5):131-138.
[3]	Agrewal S, Simon A, Bech K, et al. Defining immersion:literature review and implications for research on audiovisual experiences[J]. Audio Eng Soc, 2020, 68(6):404-417.
[4]	刘甜芳, 杨莉萍. 高职生学习沉浸体验的量表编制与特点研究[J]. 职业技术教育, 2017, 38(13):56-62.
	Liu TF, Yang LP. Study on the scale compilation and characteristics of learning flow experience of higher vocational college students[J]. Vocat Tech Educ, 2017, 38(13):56-62.
[5]	王萍, 颜文贞, 王芳, 等. 沉浸式虚拟现实技术在静脉注射法实验教学中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(2):176-180.
	Wang P, Yan WZ, Wang F, et al. The application of immersive virtual reality technology in experimental teaching of intravenous injection[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2020, 20(2):176-180.
[6]	Jung MJ, Roh YS. Mediating effects of cognitive load on the relationship between learning flow and clinical reasoning skills in virtual simulation learning[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2022, 64:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.12.004
[7]	Yoo JH, Kim YJ. Factors influencing nursing students’ flow experience during simulation-based learning[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2018, 24:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.09.001
[8]	Kim YJ, Noh GO, Im YS. Effect of step-based prebriefing activities on flow and clinical competency of nursing students in simulation-based education[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2017, 13(11):544-551. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.06.005
[9]	Kim AY, Tack HY, Lee CH. The development and validation of a learning flow scale for adults[J]. Korean J Educ Psychol, 2010, 24(1):39-59.
[10]	Heutte J, Fenouillet F, Martin-Krumm C, et al. Optimal experience in adult learning:conception and validation of the flow in education scale(EduFlow-2)[J]. Front Psychol, 2021, 12:828027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828027
[11]	Ko EJ, Nam KA, Kim EJ. Development and psychometric test-ing of learning immersion scale in clinical simulation:a methodological study[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2022, 113:105363. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105363
[12]	Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1970, 1(3):185-216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301
[13]	Courtney-Pratt H, Levett-Jones T, Lapkin S, et al. Development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with cultural simulation experience scale[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2015, 15(6):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.009 pmid: 26320780
[14]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[15]	张晨, 周云仙. 我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4):86-88,92.
	Zhang C, Zhou YX. Analysis on errors regarding content validity index used in evaluation of measurement tools in Chinese nursing literature[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2020, 35(4):86-88,92.
[16]	李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.