分娩信念量表的汉化与信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.09.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化分娩信念量表并检验其信效度。方法依据翻译和文化适应过程的实践原则对英文版分娩信念量表进行翻译、回译、专家咨询、预调查和文化调适,形成中文版分娩信念量表。邀请7名专家进行3轮内容效度评价。便利选取593名孕晚期女性,采用中文版分娩信念量表进行调查,检验中文版量表的信效度。结果中文版分娩信念量表的条目水平的内容效度指数为0.86~1,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.91;总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.76,维度的重测信度为0.83~0.84;验证性因子分析 χ²/df=4.871,RMSEA=0.081,GFI=0.955,AGFI=0.909,IFI=0.914,TLI=0.855,均达到拟合标准。结论中文版分娩信念量表具有较好的信效度,可用于评估孕晚期女性的分娩信念。

关键词: 分娩信念, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Birth Beliefs Scale（BBS） into Chinese,and to assess the reliability and validity of Birth Beliefs Scale-Chinese（BBS-C）. Methods The Principle of Good Practice for Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process was followed to translate and back-translate the BBS. The cross-cultural revision of the translated BBS was carried out through expert consulting and pilot survey. An expert panel（n=7） was invited to conduct 3 rounds evaluation of BBS-C. A total of 593 pregnant women in late pregnancy were surveyed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the BBS-C. Results The item-level CVI of BBS-C was 0.86~1 and the scale-level CVI was 0.91. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale was 0.76. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the subscales were 0.83 and 0.84. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ²/df=4.871,RMSEA=0.081,GFI=0.955,AGFI =0.909,IFI=0.914,TLI=0.855. Conclusion BBS-C has been proved to be valid and reliable,which can be used to evaluate the birth beliefs of Chinese pregnant women in late pregnancy.

Key words: Parturition beliefs, Scale, Reliability, Validity

娄艺,郭胜斌,顾丽香,张钱敏,严丽婷,邱萍萍. 分娩信念量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(9): 843-846.

LOU Yi,GUO Shengbin,GU Lixiang,ZHANG Qianmin,YAN Liting,QIU Pingping. Translation and psychometric properties evaluation of the Birth Beliefs Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2022, 19(9): 843-846.

图/表 1

参考文献 12

[1]	Preis H, Benyamini Y. The birth beliefs scale - a new measure to assess basic beliefs about birth[J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 38(1):73-80. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244180
[2]	Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, et al. The influence of women's fear,attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2012, 12:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-55
[3]	Preis H, Gozlan M, Dan U, et al. A quantitative investigation into women's basic beliefs about birth and planned birth choices[J]. Midwifery, 2018,63:46-51.
[4]	Samios C, Townsend M, Newton T. Self-compassion predicts less fear of childbirth in childless women:the mediating role of birth beliefs[J]. Psychol Health, 2021, 36(11):1336-1351. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1846737
[5]	Durgun Ozan Y, Alp Yilmaz F. Is there a relationship between basic birth beliefs and pregnancy-related anxiety in Turkey[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46(10):2036-2042. doi: 10.1111/jog.14375
[6]	Thompson SM, Low LK, Budé L, et al. Evaluating the effect of an educational intervention on student midwife self-efficacy for their role as physiological childbirth advocates[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2021, 96:104628. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104628
[7]	Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes(PRO) measures:report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation[J]. Value Health, 2005, 8(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
[8]	方积乾. 医学统计学与电脑实验[M]. 4版. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2012.
	Fang JQ. Medical statistics and computer experiments[M]. 4th ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2012.
[9]	刘可. 如何进行内容效度的检验[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2010, 25(1):37-39.
[10]	Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling[M]. 2nd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,Publishers, 2004.
[11]	侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2004.
	Hou JT, Wen ZL, Cheng ZJ. Structural equation model and its applications[M]. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, 2004.
[12]	Wilson KL, Sirois FM. Birth attendant choice and satisfaction with antenatal care:the role of birth philosophy,relational style,and health self-efficacy[J]. J Reproductive Infant Psychol, 2010, 28(1):69-83. doi: 10.1080/02646830903190946

[1]	张紫莹, 丁雯, 王茹, 曾美玲, 潘婷, 蒙浩莹. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者药物素养量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 993-999.
[2]	张学颖, 张晓翠, 尹雪梅, 夏欣华, 王莹, 王蓓, 朱红. 危重症新生儿医源性皮肤损伤风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(6): 731-737.
[3]	高肖, 魏丽丽, 周海清, 宫慧, 孙亚茹, 谷如婷. 多维度护理代际特征问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(5): 580-586.
[4]	李岩, 周晶, 徐洪娇, 樊玉霞, 李娜, 刘美红, 蔺晶. 精神科治疗性关系评估量表-护士版的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(4): 473-477.
[5]	赵冰悦, 徐钦, 王晓娟, 黄珑, 张钰红, 胡蓉芳. 数字健康素养量表的汉化、修订及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(1): 89-95.
[6]	戴美玲, 冯瑶, 张帆, 陈莹. 临床模拟学习沉浸量表的汉化及其在护理专业学生中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 946-950.
[7]	刘璇璇, 李洁琼, 郝楠, 汪静容, 汤逸蘋, 高雅. 胃癌患者照顾者鼻肠管肠内营养照护能力评估量表的编制[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(7): 845-851.
[8]	赵新爽,刘霖,张洛灵,桂莉. 绝经后女性骨质疏松症患者生活质量问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(6): 740-744.
[9]	张欢, 高敏, 刘烨, 林燕, 赵珊. 迷你临床演练评估量表在急诊科护士能力评价中的适用性修订[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(5): 523-528.
[10]	张淑, 李宏, 周松, 林文婕, 赵静, 高巨. 护患治疗性沟通量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(5): 589-593.
[11]	邵李姣, 王俊霞, 吴田瑞, 赵煜华, 葛淑怡. 临床护士反思能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 462-466.
[12]	张萌, 余立平, 孟宪梅. 卒中患者照顾者过渡期准备情况评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(4): 474-479.
[13]	王雪琪, 荆晓雷, 徐昊, 庄红霞, 李娟, 刘贤清. 神经系统评估能力量表的汉化及在神经科护士中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(3): 323-327.
[14]	黄倩, 徐慧萍, 刘延锦, 张艳, 王彦艳, 郭园丽, 蔡立柏, 郭丽娜, 李慧景. 社区老年人肌少症防控知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(2): 205-209.
[15]	黄艳芳, 郭声敏, 李翠, 夏娇, 孙鸿燕, 李雨昕. 标准预防措施问卷的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(12): 1481-1486.