混合式教学与全程线上教学在助产学课程中应用效果比较

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.08.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的比较混合式教学与全程线上教学在本科助产学课程中的应用效果,探讨学生线上学习效果的影响因素。方法天津医科大学2016级助产学课程采用混合式教学开展,包括19学时的线上教学和46学时的线下教学。2017级助产学课程采用全程线上教学,共65学时。两个年级各25名学生,通过平台收集助产方向学生线上学习数据,比较两个年级教学视频观看时长反刍比、单次课程互动得分、任务点完成分数、单次课程学生访问次数、线上课程测验平均得分和期末考试成绩。结果两个年级学生任务点完成分数和单次课程学生访问次数差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;2017级学生观看教学视频时长反刍比低于2016级（t=3.425,P<0.05）;2017级学生的单次课程学生互动得分、线上课程测验平均得分高于2016级（P<0.05）,2017级期末考试成绩低于2016级（t=2.591,P<0.05）。经多元线性回归分析,单次课程互动得分和单次课程学生访问次数是线上课程测验得分的影响因素,可解释总变异的65.4%。结论混合式教学可充分发挥线上、线下的合并优势,教师为学生提供多样化学习服务能够提高学生主动性,提升学习参与度,有助于提升线上学习效率;同时在线下课程中通过提问、讨论等策略提升教学质量,更有利于把握学生整体学习效果。

关键词: 护理教育研究, 教育, 远程, 助产学, 混合式教学

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of the blended teaching and the online teaching in Midwifery course. Methods Twenty-five students enrolled in 2016 in Tianjin Medical University were taught by the blended teaching method including 19h of online teaching and 46h of offline teaching. Another 25 students recruited in 2017 were taught by the online teaching method with a total of 65h. We collected the students’ online learning data through the platform. The ratio of video teaching time and video actual time,interaction score of each class,task completion score,number of visits per class,average online test score and final exam score were all compared between the two groups with different teaching method. Results There was no statistically significant differences in the task completion score and number of visits per class between the two grades（P>0.05）. The ratio of video teaching time and video actual time of students enrolled in 2017 was lower than that of the students in grade 2016（t=3.435,P<0.05）. The interaction score of each class and online tests of the students of grade 2017 were higher than those of the students of grade 2016（P<0.05）. The final exam score of students in grade 2017 were lower than that of the students in grade 2016（t=2.591,P<0.05）. After multiple linear regression analysis,the interaction score and the number of visits per class were the influencing factors of the online course test score,accounting for 65.4% of the total variation. Conclusion The blended teaching can combine the advantages of online and offline. Teachers can provide students with diversified learning services to improve students’ initiative and participation in learning. The blended teaching can improve the efficiency of online learning. Besides,the quality of teaching is improved through strategies such as questioning and discussion in offline courses,which is more conducive to know the overall learning effects of students.

Key words: Nursing Education Research, Education, Distance, Midwifery, Blended teaching

董胜雯,张丽丽,于雅文,胡立志. 混合式教学与全程线上教学在助产学课程中应用效果比较[J]. 中华护理教育, 2021, 18(8): 706-709.

DONG Sheng-wen,ZHANG Li-li,YU Ya-wen,HU Li-zhi. Effect comparisons of the blended teaching and the online teaching in Midwifery course[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2021, 18(8): 706-709.

图/表 2

参考文献 8

[1]	王恬, 康琳琳, 吴梦晓, 等. 我国医学类慕课课程建设的现状调查[J]. 中华护理教育, 2018, 15(1):30-34.
	Wang T, Kang LL, Wu MX, et al. A survey of medical MOOC development in China[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2018, 15(1):30-34.
[2]	René FK, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Jorge JM. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses[J]. Computers & Education, 2017, 104:18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
[3]	张胜男. 研究生网络自主学习元认知能力水平的现状调查与分析[D]. 济南:山东师范大学, 2015.
	Zhang SN. Investigation and analysis of the status quo of the metacognitive ability level of postgraduates’ autonomous online learning[D]. Jinan:Shandong Normal University, 2015.
[4]	Arora S, Goel M, Sabitha AS, et al. Learner groups in massive open online courses[J]. American Journal of Distance Education, 2017, 31(2),80-97. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2017.1300461
[5]	李爽, 王增贤, 喻忱, 等. 在线学习行为投入分析框架与测量指标研究——基于LMS数据的学习分析[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016, 22(2):77-88.
	Li S, Wang ZX, Yu C, et al. Mining LMS data for behavioral engagement indicators in online learning environments[J]. Open Education Research, 2016, 22(2):77-88.
[6]	王罗春, 胡晨燕, 蒋路漫, 等. 关于在我国高校推广慕课教学的几点思考[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2016(39):243-244.
	Wang LC, Hu CY, Jiang LM, et al. Some thoughts on popularizing MOOC teaching in Chinese colleges and universities[J]. Educ Teach Forum, 2016(39):243-244.
[7]	Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K, et al. Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process:results of a mixed-method evaluation[J]. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2009(14),725-738.
[8]	杨孝堂, 陈守刚, 严冰. 泛在学习的理论与模式[M]. 北京: 中央广播电视大学出版社, 2012.
	Yang XT, Chen SG, Yan B. The theory and model of ubiquitous learning[M]. Beijing: China Central Radio and Television University Press, 2012.

[1]	毛翠, 姚水洪, 甘椿椿, 赵华, 梁夏, 胡野. 智慧康养虚拟仿真实训教学体系的构建与实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1059-1065.
[2]	杨智慧, 李兴雯, 闭晓君, 林劲秋, 赵倩倩, 刘素婷, 罗园园, 张立力. 健康评估课程知识图谱的构建及初步应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1035-1040.
[3]	刘婷, 杨富国, 杨丽, 杨秀玲, 韩晶, 王爱敏. 护理硕士研究生使用人工智能生成内容工具体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1046-1051.
[4]	王雅琦, 高洁, 王克芳. 生成式人工智能在护理模拟教学中的潜在应用价值、挑战和展望[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1076-1081.
[5]	林丹, 张艺雄, 孙蓉, 柏亚妹, 张薛晴, 宋玉磊. 赛教融合视角下临床护理技能综合实训教学方案的设计与实践效果评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1088-1092.
[6]	庄嘉元, 申玲, 王珠珠, 胡荣, 张妍燕, 王艳, 陈晓华, 刘晓如. 社区护理学课程思政教学设计与实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(9): 1093-1098.
[7]	温弗乐, 袁晓玲, 吴觉敏, 章雅青. 护理学国家级一流本科课程的建设现状与发展建议[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 901-906.
[8]	赵阳, 罗晨玲, 刘欢, 张立力. 国家级一流本科助产学专业建设路径与成效分析[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 907-912.
[9]	朱姝芹, 许勤, 方颖, 丁亚萍, 陈明霞, 羊洋, 李现文, 嵇艳, 李维颖, 唐慧婷, 崔焱. 护理学国家级一流本科课程分类建设的实践与成效[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 919-925.
[10]	庄嘉元, 申玲, 胡荣, 王珠珠, 王艳. 社区护理学国家级线下一流本科课程的教学设计与应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 926-931.
[11]	邢颖, 羊洋, 王静, 许勤, 丁亚萍. 协同发展视域下护理学专业劳动教育课程设计与实践研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 945-949.
[12]	李淑敏, 魏征新, 尚少梅, 侯淑肖. 护理硕士专业学位研究生培养现状及发展建议[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 962-967.
[13]	胡思鸿, 王琴, 王明珠, 李汕山, 陶艳玲. 腹膜透析同伴教育者培训内容清单的构建研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 986-992.
[14]	卢嫡, 王璐, 李葆华, 乔海芹, 李丽, 薛小鹿, 刘春霞. 院前管理平台在泌尿系结石手术患者健康教育中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(8): 981-985.
[15]	刘于, 高丽佳, 张文艳, 于明峰, 文佳祺, 曾铁英. 自适应学习在护理教育中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2024, 21(7): 892-896.