ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   中文科技期刊数据库

中华护理教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 557-561.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.05.008

• 院校教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

混合式教学中护理本科生学习方式的调查研究

孙玉梅(),周强,叶铭惠,孙宏玉(),赵国栋   

  1. 100191 北京市北京 大学护理学院(孙玉梅,孙宏玉);050051 石家庄市 河北医科大学第三医 院(周强);325000 温州市温州医科大学附属第一医院(叶铭惠);100871 北京市北京大学 教育学院(赵国栋)
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-02 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 孙宏玉,博士,教授,E-mail: sunhongyu@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙玉梅,硕士,副教授, E-mail: sym8022@163.com

An investigation on the learning approaches of nursing undergraduates in the blended learning

SUN Yumei(),ZHOU Qiang,YE Minghui,SUN Hongyu(),ZHAO Guodong   

  • Received:2024-01-02 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-05-16

摘要:

目的 探讨混合式教学中护理学专业本科生深层学习与浅层学习的特点,为完善教学设计,提高教学效果提供参考。方法 采用方便取样法,选取来自11所院校的混合式教学课程中的4 180名学生,采用修订的两因素学习过程问卷(The Revise Two-factor Study Process Questionnaire,R-SPQ-2F)对其学习方式进行调查。结果 收集有效问卷3 841份,学生的深层学习得分为33(30,38),浅层学习得分为28(23,31),其中深层学习得分以中、高水平为主(分别为53.8%、40.1%),而浅层学习以中、低水平为主(分别为53.7%、31.5%);中位数检验显示,不同院校、不同课程之间学生的深层学习与浅层学习得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);Spearman相关分析显示,深层学习、深层动机、深层策略与作业量无关(P>0.05),与课程难度呈负相关(P<0.05),与学习效果、满意度呈正相关(P<0.01);浅层学习与作业量及课程难度无关(P>0.05),与学习效果、满意度呈负相关(P<0.01)。结论 混合式教学中护理学专业本科生更多采用的是深层学习,而浅层学习也有其积极意义;教师应注重学生的学习体验,激发其学习动机,促使其恰当采取不同的学习方式,以取得最佳的学习效果。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 学士, 问卷调查, 深层学习, 混合式学习

Abstract:

Objective To explore the characteristics of the deep and surface learning approaches of nursing undergraduates in blended learning,so as to provide a reference for improving the teaching design and improving the teaching effect. Methods The learning approaches of 3 841 students from 11 colleges and universities in the blended courses through convenient sampling were measured using the Revise Two-factor Study Process Questionnaire(R-SPQ-2F). Results The median scores of the 3 841 students were 33(30,38) in deep learning and 28(23,31) in surface learning. The majority of students’ deep learning scores were at middle and high levels(53.8% and 40.1% respectively),while the majority of students’ surface learning scores displayed middle and low levels(53.7% and 31.5% respectively). The non-parametric median test disclosed a statistically significant difference(P<0.01) in students’ deep and surface learning scores among different institutions and courses. Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that deep learning did not have a relationship with homework volume(P>0.05),but exhibited a negative correlation with course difficulty(P<0.05) and positive correlations with learning outcomes and satisfaction(P<0.01). On the other hand,surface learning was not associated with homework volume or course difficulty(P>0.05) and instead presented negative correlations with both learning outcomes and satisfaction(P<0.01). Conclusion Nursing undergraduates in blended courses are more likely to use deep learning,while surface learning also has its positive significance. Teachers should pay attention to students’ learning experience,stimulate their motivation to learn,and appropriately adopt different learning approaches to achieve the best learning effect.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Questionnaires, Deep learning, Blended teaching