职业防护情境模拟教学对降低临床实习学生职业危害的影响

doi:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2016.01.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨职业防护情境模拟教学在预防临床实习学生职业危害中的效果。方法将87名学生随机分为试验组（44名）和对照组（43名）。试验组采用情境模拟教学法教授职业防护知识，对照组采用传统教学法。课程结束后对学生的职业防护态度、职业防护知识知晓情况进行调查，并在10个月的实习期结束后对学生的职业危害发生情况、职业危害自我防护行为进行调查。结果试验组学生的职业防护态度正向率、职业防护知识知晓率均高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；试验组学生职业危害自我防护行为得分为（41.56±8.20）分，对照组为（32.45± 6.28）分，试验组得分高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；试验组学生曾发生1次及以上职业危害的人数为 16名，对照组为29名，试验组职业危害发生率低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论职业防护情境模拟教学能提高临床实习学生职业防护教学的质量和效果，有助于提高学生职业防护知识和职业防护行为，降低职业危害的发生。

关键词: 教学方法, 职业损伤, 学生, 护理, 临床实习

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of simulation teaching in the prevention of occupation hazards in nursing students. Methods Eighty-seven nursing students were randomly assigned to the experimental group（n=44） and the control group（n=43）. Students in the experimental group received simulation teaching in the course of occupational protection, while students in the control group received traditional teaching. Students on occupation protective attitude rate of correct answers and the occupation protection knowledge rate were investigated when the courses were completed. The occupation hazard occurrence and the occupation protection behaviors were examined at the end of the internship. Results The occupation protective attitude rate of correct answers and the occupation protection knowledge rate were significantly higher in the experimental group than that in the control group（P＜0.05）. The occupation protection behaviors scores in the experimental group was 41.56±8.20, which was significantly higher than the scores in the control group（32.45±6.28）（P＜0.05）. The number of students suffered from more than one occupation hazards in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group（P＜0.05）. Conclusion Occupation protection simulation teaching can improve the quality and effectiveness of occupation protection teaching in nursing students，as well as the occupation protection knowledge level and the protecting behavior.

Key words: Teaching Methods； Occupation Injures； Students, Nursing； Clinical Practice

陈昌连. 职业防护情境模拟教学对降低临床实习学生职业危害的影响[J]. 中华护理教育, 2016, 13(1): 39-42.

CHEN Chang-lian. Effects of simulation teaching to reduce nursing students’ occupation hazards[J]. 中华护理教育, 2016, 13(1): 39-42.

[1]	谢红芳宁丽徐静王咏梅李益民陆骏. 分阶段团体积极心理干预对护理实习生心理韧性的影响[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 196-199.
[2]	黄峥娄小平郑晓刘源. 基于双心医学的经皮冠状动脉支架植入术后患者康复模式的构建及实施[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 178-182.
[3]	雷聪云叶秀春纪伟娟王继珍. 八段锦在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者稳定期康复中的研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 188-192.
[4]	林绚丽徐楚君. 独居老年高血压患者负性情绪与自我护理能力、血压控制的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 193-195.
[5]	吴陆萍胡小黎孙慧连. 参与袋鼠式护理的早产儿父亲情感体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 211-214.
[6]	田策彭辉李亚敏祝琴赵红. 国外产后保健指南简述及对我国产后护理工作的启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 237-240.
[7]	陈萌. 激发与维持学习动机教学策略在健康评估课程中的应用效果评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 200-203.
[8]	常云飞臧爽. 护理本科生正念主体性在自我领导力、生涯适应力间的中介效应[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 204-207.
[9]	汤丽娟朱明霞黎想伍慧儿王思琛周嘉琪陆嘉燕. 澳门生命教育的开展及启示[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(3): 208-210.
[10]	高玉琴原露露张序杰陈思瑶. 口腔肿瘤患者积极心理品质与生活质量的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(2): 101-104.
[11]	徐娇. 汉藏结对帮扶“1+1”模式在护理学基础教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(2): 123-126.
[12]	颜君张俊娥黎青万丽红. 护理学硕士研究生培养过程的创新及探讨[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(2): 126-129.
[13]	殷倩董彩梅. 护理本科实习生职业决策困难与职业社会支持的相关性研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(2): 133-137.
[14]	黄秀秀, 刘溢思, 黄碧腾, 王艳玲. 临床23项护理操作规范性的评价研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(2): 85-89.
[15]	张艳杜灿灿王荣华余自娟田雨同刘珍. 基于人性照护理论的关怀实践进展及展望[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(2): 150-153.

职业防护情境模拟教学对降低临床实习学生职业危害的影响

Effects of simulation teaching to reduce nursing students’ occupation hazards

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0