ISSN 1672-9234 CN 11-5289/R
主管:中国科学技术协会 主办:中华护理学会
出版:中华护理杂志社
收录:中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
   中国期刊全文数据库
   中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库
   中文科技期刊数据库

中华护理教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 358-364.doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.03.017

• 临床实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

俯卧位有创机械通气患者心肺复苏的最佳证据总结

靳子恒1,2(),宋洁1,2(),张淑香1,2,江淑敏1,2,于万慧1,2,李汝钊1,2,刘跃1,2   

  1. 250355 济南市 山东中医药大学护理学院(靳子恒,宋洁,于万慧,李汝钊,刘跃);山东第一医科大学第一附属医院护理部(张淑香),重症医学科(江淑敏)
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-13 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-03-13
  • 通讯作者: 宋洁,博士,教授,E-mail:60060032@sdutcm.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:靳子恒,男,本科(硕士在读),护师,E-mail:1041057939@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2020年山东省研究生教育优质课程建设项目(SDYKC-20053)

Evidence summary for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone position with invasive mechanical ventilation

JIN Ziheng1,2(),SONG Jie1,2(),ZHANG Shuxiang1,2,JIANG Shumin1,2,YU Wanhui1,2,LI Ruzhao1,2,LIU Yue1,2   

  • Received:2023-09-13 Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-03-13
  • Contact: Jie SONG

摘要: 目的 总结俯卧位有创机械通气患者心肺复苏的最佳证据。 方法 计算机检索国内外临床决策支持系统、数据库及指南/专业协会网站中关于俯卧位有创机械通气患者心肺复苏的临床决策、证据总结、指南、专家共识、系统评价,文献检索时限为建库至2023年11月。由研究者筛选文献、提取资料、对纳入文献的质量进行评价,并对证据进行提取、整合及质量分级。结果 共纳入8篇文献,包括4篇指南、1篇系统评价和3篇专家共识。从体位选择、复苏准备、按压要点、除颤准备和复苏监测5个方面提取出18条最佳证据。 结论 本研究总结了俯卧位有创机械通气患者心肺复苏的最佳证据。医护人员应结合临床情境和专业判断,审慎地选择与运用证据并开展临床实践。

关键词: 俯卧位, 有创机械通气, 心肺复苏, 证据总结, 循证护理学

Abstract: Objective To summarize the best evidence on cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) in the prone position with invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in both domestic and foreign clinical decision support systems, databases as well as relevant professional or guideline websites for clinical decision-making, evidence summaries,guidelines, expert consensuses,and systematic reviews on CPR in the prone position with invasive mechanical ventilation. The time limit of searching was set from the date of database’s inception to November 2023. The researchers screened the literature,extracted the data, evaluated the quality of the included literature,and afterward,extracted, integrated,and graded the evidence. Results A total of eight studies were included, consisting of four guidelines, one systematic reviews, and three expert consensuses. In addition, 18 pieces of evidence were synthesized into five categories, which including position selection, resuscitation preparation, compression points,defibrillation preparation,and resuscitation monitoring. Conclusion This study summarizes the best evidence for performing CPR in the prone position with invasive mechanical ventilation. Medical staff should carefully select and apply evidence and carry out clinical practice based on clinical situation and professional judgment.

Key words: Prone position, Invasive mechanical ventilation, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Evidence summary, Evidence-Based Nursing